Welcome to the 580 Modellers website

News

16. Sep, 2018
Back from Holiday but lots on
Hi all,
Returned from two weeks holiday yesterday. I was hoping to post a photo report on the fantastic North West Club Meet last month, but things have gotten rather busy with the birth of a second grandchild yesterday, and the youngest is preparing to depart for University next week. So please bear with me if things are a little slow this month. I'll post what I can, when I can, and hopefully normal service will be resumed as soon as possible.

However, if you would like to see us 'in action', have a chat with us even and see where it may lead then we are next attending and displaying at the new Keighley Model Show (at University Academy Keighley, Green Head Road, BD20 6EB) on Sunday 23rd September.

Geoff Cooper-Smith

The Art of the Build Review

During my recent time at Scale Aircraft Modeller I was asked if I would be interested in producing some build reviews.  Being a Yorkshireman the offer of free kits as long as I promised to build and write about the experience, seemed to good to be true and so I accepted.

To be honest, it became a bit of a mixed bag, and not a little difficult at times.  Consequently my career in this arena was relatively short.  However, it taught me a lot about how to read a review and what it might (or might not!) be telling you.

The bit I really enjoyed was there was no agonising over which kit from the stash to start next; you received the kit in the post and you simply got on with it.  And no agonising over whether it was accurate, what to rectify and what to leave and whether to try and source any after market parts.  With a build review you build what you get, using everything in the box, as the readership want (and have a right) to know if what's in the box is any good.  OK, a few minor scratch-built additions, such as seat belts, antenna wires, etc may be necessary, but the addition of other manufacturers etch, or replacement resin seats, or aftermarket decals are a strict 'no-no'. You can still do some reasearch and communicate your concerns; I did just this with the Italeri Gulf War Mirage 2000 over the decal options and the fact that one was a reconnaisance machine although only missiles, rather than a recon pod, are included in the kit.

If the kit goes together well, is accurate and the instructions hold up i.e. give accurate colours and decal placement, then all is well.  The problem comes when there is a major problem and being able to communicate this to the readership without offending the manufacturers; the modelling press is very dependent upon 'free issue' kits for review and the associated advertising revenue from these suppliers.  My stance was the readership need to know the challenges any kit presents, good or bad, and the potential severity of such and how they might be overcome.  I have brought several kits on the basis of what I perceived to be a 'non-negative' review, only to be very disappointed during the build.  I have also learned to be aware of those reviewers whose outputs could be regarded as generic i.e. 'I glued the fuselage halves together then glued the wings on', which could refer to any kit of any age.  I had several discussions with my editor over this and developed a code which was meant to convey where the challenges lay.  Unfortunately ettiquette dictated the meaning of this code could not be 'spelled out'.  This included how many bouts of filling and sanding were required on certain parts e.g. 5 bouts meant the part fitted very badly and need a lot of 'fairing in', whether reinforcement was needed and the most severe:  Whether it had spent some time on 'the shelf of doom'!

However, some of the kits received for review remained unfinished and no review was forthcoming in the magazine.  This is not necessarily because they were unbuildable but because it was not possible for my self and the editor to agree a suitable form of words for the challenges encountered to be conveyed. And so you can start to draw your own conclusions.  If a new release gets, lets say 'generally positive' reviews from several sources then it is probably worth purchasing and having a go your self.  If you see no reviews anywhere, or they are really rather anodyne, then purchase if you must but make sure your eyes are very 'open' when its time to build.

The best, and most informative review I believe I provided was the second, succesive, build of the new Eduard 1/72 Fw 190.  I encountered several challenges in the first build, including a location issue for the main wheel bay which made assembly of the top wing less than ideal and the assembly sequence for mulitple part cowling.  However, having learned I 'nailed it' for the second build and communicated such.  Several modellers actually 'searched me out' at shows and thanked me for such an informative build.

Geoff Cooper-Smith